“Those who can, do, and those who can’t teach” This smallphrase riles me. The hair on the back of my neck stands up and I am ready to battle. I constantly endure criticism from business professionals about the length of the workday and the amount of time off I have off as an educator. Much of the time I believe the is put forth in jest, but enough already. None of my professional friends have a clue what it means to be a teacher. Their only experience with education was that of a student. (Some of them probably always received social passes) Teaching is honorable profession. The day in and day out adventure of a teacher’s life is not for the faint of heart.
Kumashiro begins his book looking at the teacher as a learned practitioner. He first suggests that teachers must understand childhood development. How do children learn? I think this idea has serious undertones of psychology to me. It is critical as a teacher to understand how children interact with each other. It is important to understand cause and effect situations which occur many times a day in my classroom. It is important for me to understand the correlation of hunger and learning, sleep and learning, the brain and learning, different types of learning. I should have aquired a psychology degree for the amount of times I am required to understand the psychological factors of a student and their learning. Next, Mr. Kumashiro points out educators must be proficient in their subject matter. For high school teachers this means understanding the material of their subject specialization. But, for a middle years educator, (I am one) this means having competent knowledge in all subject areas. This means having more than basic knowledge in language, mathematics, science, health, social studies, drama, dance, music, visual art and physical education. I have always believed that you must be competent in your subject in order to teach it to someone else, therefore, my logic tells me a middle year’s teacher must be a well- rounded intelligent being. The last notion about teaching as a learned practitioner concerns methodology. How do teachers present knowledge to students? Since all
students are different, (I know this because I learned about children: see psychology rant above), each student learns in a different way. It is important for me to have an arsenal of teaching strategies to show a student how to perform a task. This is definitely an important skill. Over the years I have learned to show the same concept in multiple ways so each learner can understand. The teacher as a learned practitioner seems to be a well-rounded professional.
It would be wonderful if I knew everything about my students; however, the reality is there are some things I will never know. Those students who are not problematic in the classroom seem to inevitably slide under my radar. Those students who are troublesome are the ones I seem to know all about. I also must be cognizant of the fact that my knowledge is not absolute. There are things I do not know. Finally, I must remember that instructional strategies and infinite. The only limitation I have on how to present material is based upon my creativity.
Kumashiro then looks at the teacher as a researcher. I believe I am a life-long learner. I enjoy learning new things. As a teacher, I have been taught to reflect on taught lessons to evaluate what went right and what went wrong. This reflection is research. I believe as an educator is important to examine what we do daily. Do we think of it as research? I think the answer is: no. As I have been learning about Action Research, I believe many components of an action research cycle are completed on a daily basis by me as a classroom teacher. I identify a problem and try a solution and evaluate its effectiveness. The components missing are general the literature review, (However, I may do some reading but not daily as I have too many problems. Sometimes I think I should be in therapy, but, as stated above, I learned about psychology and therapy is expensive) and written reflection. Most of the time the reflection is more like: Did that work? Yes or no? Then I move on to the next challenge.
It is in this section Kumashiro begins talking about oppression. Don’t get me wrong, I feel that students should be free to learn and enjoy. I get the image in my head of some sixties tie-dyed, pot smoking, folk music hootenanny campfire where everyone is free to expand their minds. It sounds like fun, but how can that translate into today’s classroom. I must secure the safety and freedom every student to develop. This notion to me means that I must limit or curtail someone’s individual freedom to achieve this goal. I will continue to think on this. Kumashiro moves on to his third topic in this chapter of teacher as professional. I think my rant at the beginning of this post explains my feeling on teaching. In the United States, teachers are ranked according to the achievement of their students on standardized tests. This to me is farcical. I know some very good teachers who teach children with severe emotional, financial and medical problems. This is where that psychology part really comes into play. These excellent teachers would never be rewarded or acknowledged as being good at what they do because they are concerned with more important aspects of a student’s life. The whole child must be educated. How do you evaluate the spiritual, emotional, physical and mental development of a child?
Gee, it is a good thing I am a well-rounded person and professional!